The vessel inspection software decision in 2026 carries higher commercial weight than at any previous point in the past decade. Port State Control detentions across DNV-classed vessels rose 23% year-over-year in Q1 2026 — 64 detentions in the first quarter versus 52 in Q1 2025 — with 84% of those detentions occurring in the Paris MOU and Tokyo MOU regions and the most-cited deficiency codes (15150 ISM Code, 15109 maintenance of ship and equipment) reflecting safety management systems that exist on paper but do not live in the daily routine. PSC detention costs run USD 40,000 to USD 110,000 per day in port fees and lost revenue. IMO Resolution A.1206(34) revised PSC procedures took effect January 1, 2026, tightening enforcement protocols. The 2026 joint Paris-Tokyo Concentrated Inspection Campaign on cargo securing runs September 1 through November 30, 2026. Beyond PSC, OCIMF's SIRE 2.0 — which permanently replaced VIQ7 on September 2, 2024 as the sole commercial tanker vetting tool — uses algorithmically-generated CVIQ questionnaires drawn from a comprehensive question library across Hardware, Procedures, and Human Factors dimensions, with approximately 100 tailored questions per inspection and a 6-month Photo Repository update requirement. Class society audits, internal ISM verification, drydock pre-attendance reviews, charterer vetting, and pre-PSC self-inspections all multiply the inspection workload. Operators that still run inspections on paper checklists, scanned PDFs filed in vessel folders, and email attachments to shore produce predictable failures: missing photos, lost findings, delayed corrective actions, and the audit-finding pattern that turns into the next detention. This guide reviews the ten leading vessel inspection software platforms for 2026 across eight criteria that actually determine deployment success. Start a free trial of Marine Inspection to see how the 2026 leader handles the full inspection lifecycle, or book a 30-minute demo to walk through your specific use case.
Best Vessel Inspection Software · 2026
Ten Vessel Inspection Platforms Reviewed Against The 2026 PSC And SIRE 2.0 Standard.
Q1 2026 detentions up 23% YoY. IMO A.1206(34) revised PSC procedures live. SIRE 2.0 CVIQ algorithm running ~100 questions per inspection. The platform you choose decides whether your fleet stays compliant or appears on next quarter's detention list.
Pre-PSC Inspection · M/V Pacific Star
Live
Section 7 of 12 · Fire Safety
7.1 Fire main pressure verified
7.2 Hydrant valves operational
7.3 CO2 system pressure low — finding
7.4 Fire alarm panel test pending
+
Why The Vessel Inspection Software Decision Carries Higher Weight In 2026
Six structural shifts moved vessel inspection software from "checklist digitization" to operational risk capability. Each shift carries real financial and regulatory weight — and each shapes how the ten platforms reviewed below should be evaluated.
01
PSC Detentions Rising 23% YoY
Q1 2026 recorded 64 detentions across DNV-classed vessels versus 52 in Q1 2025 — a 23% year-over-year increase. 84% in Paris MOU and Tokyo MOU. Detention cost USD 40,000-110,000 per day. The inspection platform you choose directly affects whether your fleet appears in next quarter's data.
02
IMO A.1206(34) Live January 2026
IMO Resolution A.1206(34) revised PSC procedures took effect January 1, 2026, tightening inspection protocols and relocating references to potentially detainable deficiencies. Platforms not updated for the new procedures produce outdated checklists and missed deficiency categories.
03
SIRE 2.0 Sole Tanker Vetting Tool
OCIMF's SIRE 2.0 permanently replaced VIQ7 on September 2, 2024. Algorithmically-generated CVIQ uses ~100 questions per inspection from a comprehensive question library across Hardware, Procedures, and Human Factors. Photo Repository requires 6-month updates. Platforms without SIRE 2.0 alignment leave tankers exposed.
04
2026 Joint CIC On Cargo Securing
Paris MOU and Tokyo MOU 2026 Concentrated Inspection Campaign on cargo securing runs September 1 through November 30, 2026. PSCOs use standardised questionnaires verifying Cargo Securing Manual compliance, lashing condition, stowage plans, and crew competency. Platforms must support CIC-specific checklists.
05
ISM Implementation Dominates Detentions
Deficiency code 15150 (ISM Code) and 15109 (maintenance of ship and equipment) lead Q1 2026 detentions. The pattern reflects safety management systems that exist on paper but do not live in the daily routine. Inspection platforms must produce evidence of operational ISM execution, not just documentation existence.
06
Tokyo MOU NIR Risk Targeting
Tokyo MOU New Inspection Regime assigns risk profiles based on six factors: ship type, age, flag state performance (White/Grey/Black list), RO performance, company ISM DOC fleet performance, and 36-month deficiency/detention history. High Risk = 5-8 month inspection window. Platform output directly feeds risk score management.
The Eight Criteria We Used To Evaluate Inspection Platforms For 2026
Inspection software ratings reduced to "good features" or "modern UI" produce poor decisions. We evaluated each platform across eight criteria that actually predict whether a fleet will pass PSC inspections, SIRE 2.0 boardings, class audits, and charterer vetting without findings — and whether crews will adopt the platform or revert to paper.
01
Mobile-First Offline Mode
Full inspection workflow accessible without internet on engine room, cargo deck, lifeboat platform. Auto-sync on connectivity restoration. Crew adoption rises or falls on the mobile experience. Engine rooms have no WiFi.
02
SIRE 2.0 + CVIQ Library
Pre-loaded SIRE 2.0 question library across Hardware, Procedures, Human Factors. Photo Repository tracking with 6-month update enforcement. HVPQ and PIQ data integration. CVIQ algorithm preparation across Core, Rotational, Campaign, Conditional questions.
03
PSC Checklist Library
IMO A.1206(34) revised checklists, Paris MOU and Tokyo MOU specific deficiency codes, regional CIC campaign questionnaires (2026 cargo securing), THETIS risk score management, USCG-specific items.
04
Photo Evidence Management
GPS-timestamped photo capture with EXIF preservation. Cannot be retroactively modified for audit integrity. SIRE 2.0 Photo Repository alignment. Annotations and markups supported. Searchable by date, location, equipment.
05
AI Checklist Generation
AI-assisted checklist creation for new inspection types. Auto-generated from regulatory updates. Crew-language localization. Vessel-type adaptation (tanker / bulker / container / LNG / passenger / offshore supply).
06
Findings & Corrective Action Workflow
Non-conformity logged, categorized, workflowed. Linked to root cause analysis and corrective action with deadlines and evidence. PMS integration for maintenance work orders. Close-out audit trail preserved.
07
Fleet-Wide Reporting & Trends
Real-time fleet rollup with drill-down to vessel and section. Deficiency trend analysis. Repeat-finding detection. THETIS risk score, RightShip rating, OCIMF SIRE 2.0 readiness scoring across vessels.
08
Pricing Transparency & Deployment
Published pricing, free trial availability, contract flexibility (month-to-month vs annual), deployment timeline. Enterprise legacy platforms quote on application; modern platforms publish bands. Time-to-value ranges from 4 weeks to 12+ months.
The 2026 Vessel Inspection Software Top 10
Our review of ten leading vessel inspection platforms for 2026, ranked by overall fit against the eight evaluation criteria. The top of the list reflects fleets prioritizing mobile-first crew adoption, comprehensive SIRE 2.0 and PSC coverage, transparent commercial terms, and fast deployment. Each review includes the best-fit profile, strengths, and limitations.
01
Marine Inspection
Mobile-first vessel inspection with SIRE 2.0, PSC, and class audit support built in
Free trial · Transparent
Marine Inspection leads the 2026 vessel inspection landscape on the dimensions that determine deployment success: true mobile-first offline app for engine room and cargo deck inspections, complete SIRE 2.0 question library with CVIQ algorithm preparation across Core, Rotational, Campaign, and Conditional questions, IMO A.1206(34) revised PSC checklists for Paris MOU and Tokyo MOU including the 2026 cargo securing CIC, GPS-timestamped photo evidence with SIRE 2.0 Photo Repository alignment, AI-assisted checklist generation across vessel types (tanker / bulker / container / LNG / passenger / offshore supply), automated non-conformity workflow with PMS integration for corrective action work orders, real-time fleet rollup with THETIS risk score and RightShip rating visibility, transparent pricing with free trial and month-to-month flexibility, and 6-12 week deployment versus the 6-15 month enterprise norm.
Best For
Tanker, bulker, container, and offshore fleets prioritizing SIRE 2.0 readiness, PSC defence, fast deployment, transparent commercial terms, and mobile-first crew adoption.
Strengths
Mobile-first offline, SIRE 2.0 + CVIQ algorithm library, IMO A.1206(34) PSC coverage, AI-assisted checklist generation, transparent pricing, free trial, 6-12 week deployment.
Limitations
Newer entrant relative to enterprise legacy QHSE suites. Best paired with a dedicated PMS for fleets needing tight maintenance integration beyond the built-in PMS connector.
02
DNV ShipManager QHSE Mobile
Class society backed inspection app within the DNV ShipManager QHSE suite
Custom quote
DNV ShipManager QHSE Mobile Inspection App's core strength is its tight integration with the full DNV ShipManager QHSE suite — connecting inspections to certificate management, audit findings, corrective action workflows, and class society data. Strong choice for DNV-classed fleets prioritizing class integration over independence.
Best For
DNV-classed fleets prioritizing class society integration with comprehensive QHSE suite coverage spanning inspections, certificates, audits, and maintenance.
Strengths
Class society backing, tight QHSE suite integration, audit-grade documentation, mature platform with proven enterprise deployments.
Limitations
Most valuable inside the DNV ecosystem; less integrated for non-DNV-classed fleets; enterprise pricing structure; longer deployment timeline.
03
SERTICA Inspection (by RINA)
Fleet management platform with strong SIRE 2.0 and audit management focus
Custom quote
SERTICA Inspection App, part of the broader SERTICA fleet management platform by RINA, is frequently highlighted for SIRE 2.0 compliance and audit management. Helps tanker operators standardize inspection responses to meet stringent oil major vetting requirements. Strong on TMSA 3 alignment and audit-grade documentation.
Best For
Tanker operators prioritizing SIRE 2.0 readiness and TMSA 3 audit preparation within a comprehensive fleet management platform.
Strengths
SIRE 2.0 focus, audit management depth, TMSA 3 alignment, RINA class society backing, integrated fleet management suite.
Limitations
Custom pricing skews toward enterprise budgets; deployment timeline typical of suite platforms; mobile experience less central than dedicated mobile-first platforms.
04
IRT V2 (MariApps smartPAL)
Inspection Reporting Tool with audio commentary and mobile-first design
Custom quote
IRT V2 from MariApps Marine Solutions emphasizes mobility and real-time data accuracy for QHSE workflows. Built on the smartPAL platform, designed for an intuitive user interface allowing inspectors to capture detailed findings including audio commentary on the move. Strong on inspector productivity in field conditions.
Best For
Operators on the smartPAL platform prioritizing inspector field productivity with audio capture and intuitive mobile workflows.
Strengths
Mobile-first design, audio commentary capture, intuitive UI, smartPAL platform integration, real-time data accuracy.
Limitations
Best fit inside the smartPAL ecosystem; integration with non-MariApps systems requires custom work; pricing on application.
05
PRIME Marine QHSE
QHSE platform aligned to TMSA 3 and ISM Code with strong incident management
Custom quote
PRIME Marine's vessel safety management system delivers integrated QHSE with explicit alignment to TMSA pillars, ISM Code requirements, and ILO MLC welfare standards. Strong on incident management, root cause analysis, and corrective action tracking. Anonymized data-pooling enables peer benchmarking against fleet performance.
Best For
Tanker operators needing TMSA 3 alignment with integrated incident management, root cause analysis, and peer benchmarking.
Strengths
TMSA 3 + ISM Code alignment, incident management depth, anonymized data-pooling, BV-type-approved PMS integration.
Limitations
Best fit inside PRIME Marine ecosystem; integration with non-PRIME systems requires custom work; mobile experience less central.
06
AMOS QHSE (SpecTec)
Enterprise QHSE module within the AMOS fleet management suite
$50K+ /yr enterprise
AMOS QHSE by SpecTec is the QHSE module within the AMOS fleet management suite — class-approved PMS with integrated inspection, audit, and incident management workflows. Long industry history with decades of maritime focus. Strong in enterprise environments managing inspection alongside maintenance and procurement in one ERP.
Best For
Enterprise fleets on the AMOS platform seeking integrated QHSE within their existing technical and procurement workflows.
Strengths
Class-approved suite, ERP-grade integration, mature platform, decades of maritime refinement.
Limitations
Enterprise pricing, longer implementation timelines, less specialized as standalone inspection tool, mobile experience secondary to desktop.
07
Ulysses Inspection
Cloud-based inspection and audit platform with mobile capture
Custom quote
Ulysses delivers cloud-based inspection and audit workflows with mobile capture, configurable templates, and finding workflows. Strong on flexibility for operators creating custom inspection types beyond the standard PSC and SIRE 2.0 templates. Mid-market positioning between enterprise suites and lightweight tools.
Best For
Mid-market operators wanting cloud-based flexibility with configurable templates beyond standard regulatory checklists.
Strengths
Cloud-native, configurable templates, mobile capture, mid-market pricing, flexibility for custom inspection types.
Limitations
Less specialized SIRE 2.0 depth than tanker-focused platforms; smaller user community than enterprise suites.
08
Star IPS
Integrated planning system with inspection, PMS, and procurement modules
Custom quote
Star IPS by Star Information Systems delivers integrated vessel management with inspection, planned maintenance, and procurement modules. Strong on Norwegian and European tanker and offshore operator markets. Cloud and offline modes supported. Integration depth across operational modules valued by enterprise users.
Best For
European tanker and offshore operators wanting integrated PMS-with-inspection workflows in a single platform.
Strengths
Integrated modules, cloud and offline modes, established in European tanker and offshore segments, mature platform.
Limitations
Custom pricing; deployment timeline typical of enterprise suites; less mobile-first than dedicated inspection platforms.
09
ShipNet QHSE
Modular ERP with QHSE inspection capabilities
Custom quote
ShipNet QHSE is the inspection and audit module within the modular ShipNet ERP for shipping operators. Strong on integration with chartering, accounting, and crewing modules. Suitable for operators consolidating multiple operational workflows on a single ERP backbone. Less specialized as a standalone inspection tool.
Best For
Operators on the ShipNet ERP looking to add inspection workflows within their existing chartering, accounting, and crewing platform.
Strengths
ERP integration breadth, chartering and accounting connectivity, established in commercial shipping operator segment.
Limitations
Less specialized inspection depth than dedicated platforms; mobile experience secondary; enterprise pricing structure.
10
Lloyd's Register Class Direct
Class society client platform with PSC pocket checklists and statistics
Class service
Lloyd's Register Class Direct provides clients with PSC monitoring, Pocket Checklists for Paris MOU and Tokyo MOU and USCG, fleet PSC performance statistics, and most-common-deficiency intelligence by region. Class-society-backed insight valuable as one input alongside a dedicated inspection software platform.
Best For
LR-classed fleets using class-society PSC intelligence as one input alongside their primary inspection software platform.
Strengths
PSC statistics depth, Pocket Checklists for major MOUs, class society intelligence, regional deficiency benchmarking.
Limitations
Complement to rather than replacement for a full inspection software platform; less workflow-oriented than dedicated apps.
The 2026 Inspection Software Comparison Matrix — Side By Side
The matrix below compares the top ten platforms across the dimensions that determine 2026 fit. Scroll horizontally on mobile for the full comparison.
| Platform | Tier | Mobile-First | SIRE 2.0 | PSC A.1206(34) | Pricing | Free Trial | Deployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marine Inspection | Mid-market | Mobile-first | Full CVIQ library | Live | Transparent | Yes | 6-12 weeks |
| DNV ShipManager QHSE | Enterprise | Module-based | Suite coverage | Module update | Custom quote | No | 6-12 months |
| SERTICA Inspection | Enterprise | Mobile app | Strong SIRE 2.0 focus | Coverage included | Custom quote | No | 3-6 months |
| IRT V2 (MariApps) | Mid-market+ | Mobile-first | Coverage included | Coverage included | Custom quote | Demo only | 3-6 months |
| PRIME Marine QHSE | Mid-market+ | Mobile access | TMSA 3 aligned | Coverage included | Custom quote | Demo only | 3-6 months |
| AMOS QHSE | Enterprise | Some mobile | Suite coverage | Module update | $50K+ /yr | No | 6-12 months |
| Ulysses Inspection | Mid-market | Mobile capture | Configurable | Coverage included | Custom quote | Demo only | 2-4 months |
| Star IPS | Enterprise | Cloud + offline | Suite coverage | Module update | Custom quote | No | 6-12 months |
| ShipNet QHSE | Enterprise | Web-based | Module coverage | Module update | Custom quote | No | 6-12 months |
| LR Class Direct | Class service | Web-based | Statistics + checklists | Pocket Checklists | Class service | Class clients | Class-bound |
Marine Inspection Demo · 30 Minutes
See How The #1 Vessel Inspection Platform Handles Your Fleet's Inspection Reality
A 30-minute session with a Marine Inspection product expert. Walk through SIRE 2.0 CVIQ preparation on your vessel type, demonstrate the IMO A.1206(34) PSC checklist library on your trading pattern, generate a sample inspection on tablet, and produce a sourced consolidation plan with deployment timeline.
The Six Inspection Workflows Centralized Software Should Cover
Beyond the criteria score, a credible 2026 inspection platform must cover six distinct inspection workflows. Each follows a different cadence, stakeholder model, and evidence standard. Platforms supporting only one or two of the six produce inspection silos that crews work around rather than within.
A
Pre-PSC Self-Inspection
Vessel approaching a port with active PSC enforcement. IMO A.1206(34) revised checklist run by crew before arrival. Deficiencies identified and corrected before PSCO boards. THETIS risk score managed through documentation discipline.
B
SIRE 2.0 Tanker Vetting Preparation
CVIQ algorithm preparation across Core, Rotational, Campaign, Conditional questions. HVPQ and PIQ data current. Photo Repository updated within 6-month requirement. Crew competency tested on Human Factors dimension.
C
ISM Internal Audit
Quarterly or annual internal ISM verification per ISM Code Element 12. Safety Management System effectiveness evaluated. Non-conformities logged with root cause analysis and corrective action tracking.
D
Class Society Survey Preparation
Pre-survey checklist run before class attendance. Continuous Machinery Survey (CMS) evidence assembled. Conditions of class progress tracked. Survey findings closed to satisfaction of attending surveyor.
E
Charterer Vetting Inspection
Charterer-specific vetting inspection alongside or in addition to SIRE 2.0. Vessel familiarization, drug and alcohol policy verification, navigation audit, cargo operations review. Vetting acceptance defends charter eligibility.
F
Pre-Drydock Survey
Drydock preparation inspection capturing baseline conditions before yard attendance. Repair scope generated from findings. Specialist contractor evidence collected. Post-drydock verification of repairs completed against the original scope.
How To Run A 2026 Inspection Software Evaluation
A structured four-week evaluation framework produces dramatically better outcomes than ad-hoc demos. The framework below maps the steps that consistently produce successful inspection platform decisions in 2026.
Week 1
Scope & Shortlist
Map fleet profile (vessel types, MOU exposure, charter mix, vetting cycles). Score the eight criteria against your reality. Shortlist 4-5 platforms across mobile-first modern, enterprise legacy, and class-society-backed tiers — including Marine Inspection as the 2026 leader.
Week 2
Trial & Demos
Start free trials of platforms that offer one (Marine Inspection). Book demos of others. Test SIRE 2.0 CVIQ preparation, IMO A.1206(34) PSC checklist coverage, photo evidence workflow, mobile offline mode, and findings-to-corrective-action workflow with real fleet data.
Week 3
Crew Pilot
Run a 5-day pilot with active crew on 1-2 vessels. Measure: how long to complete a standard checklist, how many photos captured per inspection, how many crew complete onboarding without support tickets. Crew adoption is the platform value gate.
Week 4
Decision
Compare pricing transparency, contract flexibility, free trial availability, deployment timeline. Confirm 2026 regulatory pre-alignment (IMO A.1206(34), SIRE 2.0 CVIQ, cargo securing CIC) in writing. Decision sign-off with phased rollout plan.
Why Marine Inspection Leads The 2026 Vessel Inspection Ranking
Marine Inspection ranked #1 for 2026 fit across the eight evaluation criteria. Mobile-first crew adoption, complete SIRE 2.0 + IMO A.1206(34) coverage, AI-assisted checklist generation, transparent pricing with free trial, and 6-12 week deployment versus the 6-15 month enterprise norm. Start a free trial or book a 30-minute demo to see the platform in action.
Mobile-First Offline App
True offline capability for engine room, cargo deck, lifeboat platform inspections. Full checklist access, photo capture, finding logging without internet. Auto-sync on connectivity restoration. The mobile experience is where crew adoption succeeds or fails.
SIRE 2.0 CVIQ Library Built In
Complete question library across Core, Rotational, Campaign, and Conditional categories. Hardware, Procedures, and Human Factors dimensions. HVPQ and PIQ data integration. Photo Repository with 6-month update enforcement. Crew competency tracking.
IMO A.1206(34) PSC Coverage
Revised PSC checklists effective January 1, 2026. Paris MOU, Tokyo MOU, USCG specific deficiency codes. 2026 cargo securing CIC questionnaire ready. THETIS risk score management built into the documentation discipline.
AI-Assisted Checklist Generation
AI-generated checklists for new inspection types, regulatory updates, vessel-type adaptation, crew-language localization. Custom inspection types built in minutes rather than coded by integration teams.
Findings-To-Corrective-Action Workflow
Non-conformity logged, categorized, workflowed with root cause analysis and corrective action tracking. PMS integration generates maintenance work orders automatically. Close-out audit trail preserved for audit defence.
Transparent Pricing & 6-12 Week Deployment
Published pricing bands rather than custom quotes. Free trial with full functionality. Month-to-month flexibility versus enterprise multi-year contracts. 6-12 week deployment versus 6-15 month enterprise norm.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best vessel inspection software for 2026?
There is no single "best" — the right platform depends on fleet size, vessel mix, regulatory exposure, and existing technology stack. For commercial fleets prioritizing mobile-first crew adoption, complete SIRE 2.0 and IMO A.1206(34) coverage, transparent commercial terms, and fast deployment, Marine Inspection leads the 2026 shortlist. For DNV-classed fleets, DNV ShipManager QHSE Mobile offers tightest class society integration. For tanker operators prioritizing SIRE 2.0 within a broader fleet management suite, SERTICA Inspection by RINA is a strong choice. For operators on the smartPAL platform, IRT V2 emphasizes inspector productivity with audio capture. For PRIME Marine ecosystem fleets, PRIME Marine QHSE delivers TMSA 3 alignment with strong incident management. The eight-criteria framework — mobile-first offline, SIRE 2.0 + CVIQ library, IMO A.1206(34) PSC coverage, photo evidence, AI checklist generation, findings workflow, fleet reporting, pricing transparency — produces a fit decision rather than a universal ranking.
Why did Marine Inspection rank #1 for 2026?
Marine Inspection scored highest across the eight evaluation criteria for 2026 fit. True mobile-first offline app for engine room and cargo deck inspections where WiFi does not reach. Complete SIRE 2.0 CVIQ question library across Core, Rotational, Campaign, and Conditional categories with Hardware, Procedures, and Human Factors dimensions. IMO A.1206(34) revised PSC checklists for Paris MOU, Tokyo MOU, and USCG with the 2026 cargo securing CIC questionnaire built in. GPS-timestamped photo evidence with SIRE 2.0 Photo Repository alignment. AI-assisted checklist generation across vessel types and regulatory updates. Findings-to-corrective-action workflow with PMS integration. Transparent published pricing with free trial and month-to-month flexibility. 6-12 week deployment versus the 6-15 month enterprise norm. Marine Inspection is narrower than enterprise legacy QHSE suites on tight maintenance integration beyond the built-in PMS connector — best paired with a dedicated PMS for fleets needing that depth.
What is the Q1 2026 PSC detention picture?
Q1 2026 recorded 64 detentions across the DNV-classed fleet versus 52 in Q1 2025 — a 23% year-over-year increase. 84% of detentions were issued by authorities within the Paris MOU and Tokyo MOU. 83% of detentions involved container ships, bulk carriers, and general cargo vessels. The most frequently cited deficiency codes were 15150 (ISM Code as a whole) and 15109 (maintenance of ship and equipment, the latter used only by Tokyo MOU and the US). The pattern reflects safety management systems that exist on paper but do not live in the daily routine. Detention cost USD 40,000-110,000 per day per vessel in port fees and lost revenue. IMO Resolution A.1206(34) revised PSC procedures took effect January 1, 2026, tightening enforcement. The 2026 joint Paris-Tokyo MOU Concentrated Inspection Campaign on cargo securing runs September 1 through November 30, 2026.
What changed with SIRE 2.0?
OCIMF's SIRE 2.0 permanently replaced VIQ7 on September 2, 2024 as the sole commercial tanker vetting tool. The shift is fundamental rather than incremental. Where VIQ7 relied on standardized questions with binary answers, SIRE 2.0 uses a risk-based, algorithmically-generated questionnaire that assesses every aspect across Hardware, Procedures, and Human Factors dimensions. The Compiled Vessel Inspection Questionnaire (CVIQ) is algorithmically generated based on vessel type, operational history, PIQ declarations, and which rotational questions have already been assigned — ensuring no two consecutive inspections are identical, with approximately 100 tailored questions per inspection drawn from the comprehensive question library. The Photo Repository requires 6-month updates. Crew competency is now evaluated directly through observation under Human Factors. Tanker operators preparing for SIRE 2.0 need digital platforms tracking which Core, Rotational, Campaign, and Conditional questions have previously covered each vessel.
What does vessel inspection software typically cost?
Pricing varies dramatically by tier. Enterprise platforms (DNV ShipManager, AMOS, SERTICA, Star IPS, ShipNet) typically quote custom — AMOS ranges from USD 50,000+ annually per vessel for enterprise deployments. Mid-market platforms range from a few hundred to a few thousand dollars per vessel per month depending on module mix. Marine Inspection publishes transparent pricing with free trial and month-to-month flexibility. Total cost of ownership depends on number of vessels, inspection types covered (PSC / SIRE 2.0 / ISM / class / charterer / drydock), integration requirements with PMS and ERP systems, and implementation services. Implementation typically adds 50-100% of first-year license cost for enterprise platforms. Modern platforms minimize implementation cost through pre-built templates, AI-assisted configuration, and shorter timelines.
How long does inspection software deployment take?
Deployment timelines vary 4x across tiers. Modern cloud-native platforms with pre-built templates deploy in 4-12 weeks — Marine Inspection at 6-12 weeks. Mid-market suite modules typically deploy in 3-6 months. Enterprise legacy platforms (DNV ShipManager QHSE, AMOS QHSE, Star IPS, ShipNet) typically require 6-12+ months including data migration, custom integration, template configuration, and crew training. The deployment timeline matters operationally — every month of delay is a month of regulatory exposure under IMO A.1206(34) revised PSC procedures and the 2026 cargo securing CIC, and a month longer until ROI from reduced detention exposure. Best practice phased rollout: weeks 1-3 template configuration; weeks 4-6 fleet data migration; weeks 7-9 crew training and pilot operations; weeks 10-12 live operations and feedback tuning.
What is mobile-first offline and why does it matter?
Mobile-first offline means the inspection app delivers full workflow — checklist access, photo capture, finding logging, signature collection — without an internet connection. Sync to shore happens automatically when connectivity is restored. This matters because the locations where inspections happen are exactly the places where WiFi does not reach: engine rooms, double-bottom tanks, cargo holds, lifeboat platforms, ballast water systems. A platform that requires connectivity forces inspectors to write findings on paper and re-enter them in the office — destroying the documentation discipline that PSC officers and SIRE 2.0 inspectors evaluate. Mobile-first design also drives crew adoption: a sub-60-second checklist completion experience encourages habit formation, while a clunky desktop interface produces workarounds. Crew adoption is the platform value gate — without it, the software produces an inspection silo that crews work around rather than within.
How do we get started with Marine Inspection?
Two paths. Start a free trial directly — the platform loads with sample fleet data including pre-configured SIRE 2.0 CVIQ question library, IMO A.1206(34) PSC checklists, photo repository workflow, and findings management so DPAs, technical superintendents, masters, and chief engineers can explore the mobile-first crew app, offline mode, and 2026 regulatory pre-alignment before any commitment. Or book a 30-minute demo with a Marine Inspection product expert — the walkthrough maps your fleet's current inspection workflows against the eight-criteria framework, demonstrates SIRE 2.0 CVIQ preparation on your vessel type, walks through IMO A.1206(34) PSC checklist coverage for your trading pattern, generates a sample inspection on tablet, and produces a sourced consolidation plan with deployment timeline. Most operators identify documentation gaps and adoption opportunities in the session itself. Both paths converge if you decide to implement — phased onboarding by vessel cohort, fleet data migration in weeks 4-6, full multi-vessel live operations within a fiscal quarter.
Ready When You Are
See The #1 Vessel Inspection Platform For 2026 In Action.
Mobile-first offline app, complete SIRE 2.0 CVIQ library, IMO A.1206(34) PSC coverage, AI-assisted checklist generation, GPS-timestamped photo evidence, findings-to-corrective-action workflow, transparent pricing with free trial, 6-12 week deployment — Marine Inspection ranked #1 across the eight 2026 evaluation criteria.
