The Tokyo MOU is the port state control regime governing the Asia-Pacific — the world's busiest shipping region, handling over 60% of global maritime trade. With 21 member authorities conducting tens of thousands of inspections annually through the Asia Pacific Computerized Information System (APCIS), the Tokyo MOU adopted the New Inspection Regime (NIR) in January 2014, shifting from a quota-based system to a risk-based targeting approach that concentrates inspection resources on vessels most likely to be substandard. Under NIR, every ship in the APCIS database receives a Ship Risk Profile (SRP) calculated from ship type, age, flag state performance, classification society track record, company (ISM) performance, and deficiency/detention history. This profile determines your inspection window — from 5-8 months for high-risk ships to 24-36 months for low-risk vessels. Research analysing over 125,000 Tokyo MOU inspection records shows that ships older than 6 years are significantly more likely to be found substandard, and vessels with five or more deficiencies face a high probability of detention. The 2026 Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC), conducted jointly with the Paris MOU, focuses on Cargo Securing — meaning every ship calling at Asia-Pacific ports between September and November 2026 should prepare for detailed cargo lashing and securing verification. Start a free trial of Marine Inspection to track PSC performance, deficiency history, and pre-arrival preparation across your fleet.

Tokyo MOU: Asia-Pacific Port State Control
21
Member Authorities
Covering 60%+ of global maritime trade
NIR
Risk-Based System
New Inspection Regime since January 2014
APCIS
Database
Asia Pacific Computerized Information System
2026
CIC: Cargo Securing
Joint campaign with Paris MOU: Sep-Nov 2026

The 21 Member Authorities

Tokyo MOU member authorities coordinate inspections, share detention data through APCIS, and apply harmonised targeting criteria. A detention in any member port is immediately visible to all others.

Australia
Canada
Chile
China
Fiji
Hong Kong, China
Indonesia
Japan
Korea (Republic of)
Malaysia
Marshall Islands
New Zealand
Papua New Guinea
Peru
Philippines
Russian Federation
Singapore
Thailand
Vanuatu
Viet Nam
Panama (Associate)

NIR Ship Risk Profile: How Your Vessel Is Scored

The NIR calculates a Ship Risk Profile (SRP) for every vessel in the APCIS database. Points are assigned or deducted based on multiple factors — the total determines whether your ship is categorised as High Risk, Standard Risk, or Low Risk. Book a Marine Inspection demo to see how fleet-wide PSC risk monitoring works.

Ship Risk Profile Factors
Ship Type
Higher-risk types (chemical tankers, gas carriers, oil tankers, bulk carriers, passenger ships) receive additional risk points
Ship Age
Older vessels receive more points. Research shows ships over 6 years are significantly more likely to be substandard. Over 12 years = highest risk weighting.
Flag State Performance
Based on Tokyo MOU Black-Grey-White list. White list flag with IMO Audit = low risk criteria met. Minimum 30 inspections in 3-year rolling period required for listing.
Recognised Organisation (RO)
Classification society performance based on deficiency and detention rates. High performance + recognised by Tokyo MOU member = low risk criteria met. Minimum 60 inspections required.
Company Performance
ISM DOC holder's fleet-wide detention index and deficiency index compared against Tokyo MOU average. Below-average performance = higher risk.
Deficiency/Detention History
Number and severity of deficiencies and any detentions in the 36-month rolling period. Five or more deficiencies = high detention probability.
Inspection Windows by Risk Level
High Risk
5-8 months
Priority inspection. May be inspected at every port call.
Standard Risk
10-18 months
Periodic inspection within the window.
Low Risk
24-36 months
Extended window. Requires White list flag, high-performance RO, clean history.

Tokyo MOU Inspection Types

The MOU defines four inspection types, each with increasing depth. Understanding the escalation triggers helps Masters manage the inspection professionally.

Table 1: Tokyo MOU Inspection Types and Procedures
Type Scope Trigger What Officers Check Typical Duration
Initial Document and certificate verification + general impression Ship selected through SRP targeting, overdue inspection window, or random selection Statutory certificates validity, crew certificates, record books, general condition, hygiene, safety equipment visual check 2-4 hours
More Detailed Thorough examination of specific areas Clear grounds from initial inspection — expired certificates, crew incompetence, visible defects, poor maintenance Fire safety systems testing, LSA function tests, navigation equipment operation, engine room detailed check, pollution prevention verification 4-8 hours
Expanded Comprehensive verification across multiple conventions Overriding factors — vessel detained in previous 24 months, collision/grounding report, operational deficiency patterns ISM Code audit-level check, structural condition, full safety equipment test, crew competency assessment including drills, MARPOL compliance verification 1-2 days
CIC Inspection Targeted questionnaire on campaign topic + normal inspection Annual CIC period (typically Sep-Nov). 2026 focus: Cargo Securing Standard inspection items plus CIC-specific questionnaire. Results shared across all MOU members and with Paris MOU for joint campaigns. Varies (added to normal inspection)
Monitor Your Fleet's Tokyo MOU Performance
Deficiency tracking, detention history management, pre-arrival checklists, certificate expiry alerts, CIC preparation — Marine Inspection gives fleet managers complete visibility of PSC risk across Asia-Pacific operations.

Recent CIC Campaigns

Concentrated Inspection Campaigns target a specific compliance area each year. Results are published and influence future targeting. Preparing for the current CIC topic before calling at Asia-Pacific ports is essential. Sign up for Marine Inspection to receive CIC preparation alerts and questionnaire checklists.

Table 2: Tokyo MOU Concentrated Inspection Campaigns
Year CIC Topic Joint With Key Focus Areas
2026 Cargo Securing Paris MOU Cargo Securing Manual, lashing equipment condition, cargo stowage plan, crew competency in securing procedures
2025 Ballast Water Management Black Sea MOU IBWMC validity, BWMS operational status, BWRB entries, crew familiarity, D-2 compliance
2024 Seafarers' Working & Living Conditions Paris MOU SEAs, hours of rest records, wages, accommodation, food quality, complaint procedures
2023 STCW Certification Paris MOU CoC validity, flag endorsements, BST refresher currency, watch arrangements
2022 SOLAS Safety Equipment Paris MOU LSA equipment, fire safety, navigation systems, emergency procedures

Asia-Pacific PSC Preparation Checklist

Use this before every port call in Tokyo MOU member ports. It covers the specific items Tokyo MOU PSCOs prioritise based on published deficiency statistics and CIC focus areas. Schedule a demo to see how Marine Inspection automates pre-arrival checklist completion with timestamped evidence.

Tokyo MOU — Pre-Arrival Preparation Checklist
Certificates & Risk Profile
All statutory certificates valid — verify against APCIS record if last inspection was in Tokyo MOU region
Flag state on Tokyo MOU White List — if Grey/Black, expect higher inspection frequency
Classification society (RO) meets Tokyo MOU high performance criteria
Previous deficiencies from last Tokyo MOU inspection all closed with documented evidence
Fire Safety & LSA
Fire doors operational — no doors wedged open, self-closing mechanisms functional
Fire detection system tested — all zones operational, no bypassed detectors
Lifesaving appliances ready — EPIRBs, SART, immersion suits, liferafts in survey date
Crew can conduct fire drill and abandon ship drill competently if requested
Record Books & Crew
Oil Record Book, Garbage Record Book, BWRB current — all entries signed
Hours of rest records — no violations of 10hr/77hr minimums for any crew member
Every officer's STCW certificates match their assigned position with valid flag endorsement
Seafarer Employment Agreements signed for every crew member — copies retained by seafarers
2026 CIC: Cargo Securing
Cargo Securing Manual onboard — approved, ship-specific, and matching current cargo gear
Lashing equipment in good condition — turnbuckles, chains, twist locks, wire ropes inspected
Cargo stowage plan available and matches actual cargo arrangement
Crew familiar with cargo securing procedures — can explain lashing patterns for current cargo

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Tokyo MOU and which countries are members?
The Tokyo MOU is the port state control agreement for the Asia-Pacific region, with 21 member authorities including major maritime nations like Australia, Canada, China, Japan, Korea, Singapore, and others. Panama participates as an associate member. Members coordinate inspections through the APCIS database and apply the New Inspection Regime (NIR) for risk-based ship targeting. Detention data is shared across all members and with other regional MOUs.
How does the NIR Ship Risk Profile work?
The NIR assigns every ship a risk profile based on six factors: ship type (certain types rated higher risk), ship age (over 12 years = highest weighting), flag state performance (White/Grey/Black list), RO (classification society) performance, company (ISM DOC holder) fleet performance, and deficiency/detention history over a 36-month rolling period. The combined profile determines the inspection window: High Risk (5-8 months), Standard Risk (10-18 months), Low Risk (24-36 months).
What is the 2026 CIC topic for Tokyo MOU?
The 2026 Concentrated Inspection Campaign, conducted jointly with the Paris MOU, focuses on Cargo Securing. Running September to November 2026, PSCOs will use a standardised questionnaire to verify Cargo Securing Manual compliance, lashing equipment condition, cargo stowage plans, and crew competency in securing procedures — alongside their normal inspection items. Ships calling at any Tokyo MOU port during this period should prepare specifically for cargo securing verification.
How can I check my ship's status in the Tokyo MOU database?
The APCIS database is accessible through the Tokyo MOU website (tokyo-mou.org). You can search by ship name, IMO number, or flag to view inspection history, deficiencies recorded, and detention records. This is the same data PSCOs access when deciding whether to inspect your vessel — reviewing your own record before arrival helps you anticipate inspection likelihood and prepare accordingly.
What triggers detention in Tokyo MOU ports?
Detention occurs when deficiencies are clearly hazardous to safety, health, or the environment, or constitute serious or repeated convention breaches. Research on 125,000+ Tokyo MOU inspection records shows that five or more deficiencies in a single inspection significantly increases detention probability. The most common detention categories across Asia-Pacific are ISM non-conformities, fire safety failures, certificate/documentation issues, and lifesaving appliance defects — consistent with global PSC detention patterns.
Stay Ahead of Tokyo MOU Inspections
Ship risk profile monitoring, APCIS record tracking, pre-arrival checklists, deficiency close-out workflows, CIC preparation alerts, certificate management — Marine Inspection keeps your fleet inspection-ready across every Asia-Pacific port call.